Search results for: Author=Glöckner [107]

Pages

2018
Belastbare und effiziente Wissenschaft: Strategische Ausrichtung von Forschungsprozessen als Weg aus der Replikationskrise
Psychologische Rundschau
69
22-36
2018
Cross-national in-group favoritism in prosocial behavior: Evidence from Latin and North America
Judgment and Decision Making
13
1
42-60
2018
Some Metatheoretical Reflections on Adaptive Decision Making and the Strategy Selection Problem
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
31
2
181-198
2018
The joint benefits of observed and unobserved social sanctions
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
75
105-116
2018
Think it through before making a choice? Processing mode does not influence social mindfulness
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
74
85-97
2018
2017
Defendant Should Have the Last Word – Experimentally Manipulating Order and Provisional Assessment of the Facts in Criminal Procedure
2017/24
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
Bonn
2017
Abstract
From a normative perspective the order in which evidence is presented should not bias legal judgment. Yet psychological research on how individuals process conflicting evidence sug-gests that order could matter. The evidence shows that decision-makers dissolve ambiguity by forging coherence. This process could lead to a primacy effect: initial tentative interpretations bias the view on later conflicting evidence. Or the process could result in a recency effect: the evidence presented last casts decisive light on the case. In two studies (N1 = 221, N2 = 332) we test these competing hypotheses in a mock legal case. Legal orders sometimes even expect judges to provisionally assess the evidence. At least they have a hard time preventing this from happening. To test whether this creates or exacerbates bias, in the second dimensions, we explicitly demand experimental participants to express their leaning, after having seen half of the evidence. We consistently observe recency effects and no interactions with leanings. If the legal order wants to preempt false convictions, defendant should have the last word.
Race for Power in Public Good Games with Unequal, Unstable Punishment Power
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
30
2
582-609
2017
What provides justification for cheating – producing or observing counterfactuals?
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
30
4
964-975
2017
When knowledge activated from memory intrudes on probabilistic inferences from description - the case of stereotypes
Acta Psychologica
180
64-78
2017